About h4831sc
About h4831sc
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was creating far more stress and was slower compared to the old things. I do not don't forget if I even attempted regular h4831 or not; I am pondering not.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain size, hence, the designation SC or shorter Slice. The shorter, much more compact kernels enable the powder to stream throughout the powder measures extra easily, assisting to relieve the constant slicing of granules.
The point that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you are observing higher velocities acquired with that powder, in contrast to what you've seen Along with the IMR stuff. Also great powder, but rather far better suited to a little lesser scenarios which has a bit significantly less capability.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head to inside the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm saving the minimal I have remaining for slide 2021. I would begin reduced and work your way up, depending on what load data you look at for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
INgunner54 explained: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some teams.
Apache Jct Excellent facts, I have jars of both and generally wondered if they could be reloaded Along with the exact same recipes should really I run out of 1 or the other.
Any individual loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the effects, any data you may share? Must also mention I've some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I want to test out, When you've got details on that too.
Chances are you'll possibly: one) Continue and have the things shown underneath automatically removed from your buying cart:
I have located the precise reverse to generally be legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly precise powder in my 300 Get Mag.
Furthermore, it goes on to claim that because of the fshorter grains, that load density might be a little bit greater.
I needed a tad more myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug being coated for some time (and possess a lot of a similar large amount of powder).
It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Discovered a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 five shot team these days. It can be just a little h4831sc slower than H1000, but shoots superior. Thanks for the recommendation, It is really very good to recognize that I've obtained options when one particular or one other powder is dried up.
I typically always have the sc Edition. Employing a powder measure it hangs up fewer as a consequence of shorter kernels and I feel enables additional regular metering so less time you are taking trickling in the last little bit of demand for making excess weight. So basically the SC saves you times
I discovered h4831sc that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min prices. I’m conversing 2700 (probably 2800) fps, it absolutely was a very low h4831sc 60s grain cost in the Norma situation. Not what I used to be trying to find, but correct nonetheless.